What? Children's Health Has Something to Do With Academic
Success? You're kidding!
Thursday, August 23, 2007 7:55 PM
Comments [2]
While governor of Texas and initiator of the so-called "Texas
education miracle" aimed at helping poor and minority children
succeed academically, George W. Bush had an opportunity to use a
large budget surplus to provide affordable health care for 250,000
poor children. Instead, he called a special legislative
session. Declaring "people are hurting out there," Bush pushed
through a $45 million tax break for oil well owners.
Fast-forward to 2007 and we find the No Child Left Behind president
responding similarly to poor children's needs by threatening to veto
a bipartisan bill, the State Children's Health Insurance Plan
(SCHIP), that would extend health insurance to millions of uninsured
children. Bush worries that the program would be too expensive and
(worry of worries!) that it would "encourage more people to go on
government health care." Instead, he proposes a federal plan that
would remove about one million children currently receiving health
insurance and increase the number of uninsured children from nine to
ten million. While proclaiming to be making education policy that
keeps "a historic commitment to our children," the president
apparently sees no connection between children's academic achievement
and their health.
Of course the connection is no news for teachers, who see its
critical importance everyday in their classrooms, or to researchers
who have studied it. For example, Stephanie M. Spernak and
colleagues examined health and academic achievement in former Head
Start children. They found that children's health status when
beginning school predicted third grade achievement scores and
"children in poor general health had significantly lower achievement
scores than children in good general health in third
grade." Similarly, Brenda Needham and colleagues found that
self-reported physical health problems were associated with school
failure, mostly because health problems contribute to school
absenteeism, trouble with homework, and student-teacher
bonding. Asthmatic children in the United States miss
approximately 14 million days of school, but the rate of school
absenteeism is twice as high among poor and minority asthmatic
children living in urban areas.
And health insurance makes a difference! A California study showed
that after obtaining health care, children who had been in poor
health improved their school attendance, attention in class, and the
extent to which they kept up with school activities. Of course these
changes contributed to improved academic performance. A University
of Missouri study found that children who enrolled in the state's
health insurance program had 39% fewer school absences. Uninsured
children with asthma miss more school days.
Bush's threat to veto the SCHIP legislation illustrates what is often
omitted in discussions of NCLB and its chief instructional mandate,
Reading First. Besides being an attempt to wreck the public
schools, replace a full education with mindless skills training, and
increase control over teachers' work and power, NCLB serves as cruel
ideological instrument by which to focus the nation on a pretense of
helping poor and minority children while making war on them by
slashing every federal policy initiative critical to their lives and
educational success.
Again, a look back at Texas reveals the template for this
policy. While focusing on the so-called "Texas education miracle,"
which has been soundly debunked by several independent studies, Bush
was indifferent to poor children. For example, while he was
governor, Texas ranked second highest among states in the percentage
of people - especially children - who went hungry. Yet he vetoed a
minimal step to help the malnourished, i.e., a bill to coordinate
hunger programs in Texas. As governor he slashed the state's food
stamp payments, support essential for poor children, by $1
billion. When a reporter asked him about hunger in the state, the
governor answered, "Where?" As president, he has cut or attempted
to cut federal support for countless programs, such as affordable
housing, food stamps, lead decontamination, urban pollution
reduction, and Head Start that would better poor children's lives and
contribute to their academic success.
Right now educators can make a difference in taking one important
step to help poor children's health and education. Go to the
Campaign for Health Care at
http://www.childrenshealthcampaign.org/. There you'll be able to
sign a petition to Congress and the President that calls for health
coverage for all children. You'll also find information on how to
call your senators and urge them to support SCHIP and how to recruit
family and friends in this effort. Both the House and Senate bills
would provide additional funds to provide health insurance for
millions of poor children. These bills are inadequate in that they
would not cover all uninsured children, but are the best the
Democrats can do right now in order to get sufficient Republican
support to override a presidential veto.
Given the grim realities of current domestic policy, both bills and
the final compromise bill will be a critical victory for many poor
children. By voicing support for these bills, educators can help
defeat one aspect of the war on poor children's education.