Five years in, results paint complex picture of Common Core
More than five years after many states implemented Common Core, the impact on student achievement remains unclear—though some states show small academic gains, with persistent achievement gaps.
“Common Core is alive and well,” says Adam Ezring, policy director of the Collaborative For Student Success, a nonprofit that supports use of the standards. “While it’s still too early to know the full impact of the standards, we’ve seen some promising results from early adopters.” More than 40 states have Common Core or very similar standards in place, he adds.
In Kentucky, the first state to adopt the standards in 2010, student achievement has improved overall. In Tennessee, another 2010 adopter, fewer students need remediation, Ezring says.
However, the number of states that have left the PARCC and Smarter Balanced testing consortia does not bode well for the future of the standards, says Tom Loveless, senior fellow of governance studies at the Brown Center on Education Policy at the Brookings Institute (see map, page 15).
“One of the main objectives of Common Core advocates was the idea that you could measure a kid’s math ability in Maine, and it would be comparable to a student in Wyoming,” Loveless says. “But those across-state comparisons have been completely blown out of the water because of the fragmentation of both PARCC and Smarter Balanced.”
Backing from teachers has also waned, according to an Education Next poll: In 2013, 76 percent of teachers supported the Common Core. In 2015, only 40 percent did.
Standardized testing results are mixed: Researchers from the Brown Center found that fourth- and eighth-grade students in states that spent money on more activities related to Common Core adoption outperformed their peers on the National Assessment of Educational Progress between 2009 and 2013.
But between 2013 and 2015, students in non-adoption states made larger NAEP gains than those in Common Core states, leading some to question if the largest impact of the new learning standards has already occurred.
Many educators say it is still too early to draw conclusions about how the standards are affecting student assessment data, as states are in different stages of implementation.
Eye on Kentucky
In Kentucky, more than 70 percent of elementary school students scored “proficient” or better in both reading and math on the state’s pre-Common Core standardized tests. After introducing Common Core-aligned assessments in 2012, proficiency levels dropped to 48 percent in reading and 40 percent in math.
But scores soon began to rise: By spring 2015, 54 percent of Kentucky’s elementary school students were proficient in English and 49 percent hit the mark in math.
At Jefferson County Public Schools in Louisville—Kentucky’s largest district with 100,600 students—teachers and administrators revamped the curriculum and created an online bank of teacher resources in preparation for full Common Core implementation in 2011-12.
After an initial dip in test scores, all student groups in the district had a 6 percent increase in reading and math proficiency from 2012 to 2015. However, African-American student scores increased only 5 percent. Scores for all groups plateaued this year, says Assistant Superintendent for Academics Karen Branhamm.
Jefferson County started with its youngest students to narrow the achievement gap. In 2014, the district piloted a kindergarten readiness camp teaching reading and math skills for 300 students from low-income families, with tremendous gains in reducing the gap. This year it expanded to 1,200 students.
Many teachers still struggle to understand the complexity of the standards, says Jenni Aberli, a high school English/language arts specialist in Jefferson County. It is especially difficult for first- year teachers whose college programs did not prepare them adequately for the complexities of the Core, she adds.
The district now works with local Bellarmine University for professional development in literacy education for their teachers and principals.
“Higher standards for kids aren’t the problem,” Aberli says. “It will take time and work—it’s not easy, but it’s the right work.”