You are here

News Update

The state of principal and teacher evaluations

Districts grapple with the practical realities of teacher and principal evaluations
Source: National Council on Teacher Quality (Click to enlarge)
Source: National Council on Teacher Quality (Click to enlarge)

The vast majority of states require student growth and achievement to be factored into teacher and principal evaluations.

But most states and districts are now grappling with the practical realities of implementing those policies, according to the October report “State of the States 2015: Evaluating Teaching, Leading and Learning” from the National Council on Teacher Quality.

In many cases, states are transitioning to new standards-aligned testing systems while also trying to determine teacher effectiveness in evaluations.

Only five states—California, Iowa, Montana, Nebraska and Vermont—still have no formal policy requiring that teacher evaluations take objective measures of student achievement into account.

Three states—Alabama, New Hampshire and Texas—have evaluation policies that exist only as a part of ESEA waiver requests to the federal government.

Over the last five years, almost every state that redesigned its teacher evaluations also changed principal evaluation policies, according to the report.

Thirty-four states require an annual evaluation for all principals, and 19 states require student achievement and/or growth to be the largest part of principal evaluations. An additional 14 states require student growth to be significant in principal ratings.